Fostering Inclusive Education through Gamification in Secondary Schools in Malta: Enhancing Student Assessment

Open Menu

Fostering Inclusive Education through Gamification in Secondary Schools in Malta: Enhancing Student Assessment

Authors

Priscilla Ann Madiona Fenech

Ministry for Education, Sport, Youth, Research and Innovation

https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1311-2472

Robert Vella

MCAST

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0355-1257

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62695/GXSV5798

Keywords:

Inclusion, Gamification;, Assessment;, Teaching methodologies, Diversity

Abstract

This study explores the integration of gamification and Technological Advanced Machines (TAMs) to foster inclusive education and enhance student assessment in secondary schools. Utilising a mixed-methods approach, the study combines quantitative data from online questionnaires with qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews. The research investigates how TAMs can address the diverse needs of students. Findings reveal that while educators recognise the potential of gamification and TAMs to boost student engagement and motivation, challenges such as technical difficulties and the need for professional development persist. The study highlights the importance of personalised learning approaches, culturally responsive teaching practices, and continuous professional development to implement these technologies effectively. By integrating the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) theoretical framework with empirical evidence on gamification effectiveness, student engagement, and technology adoption, this research provides valuable insights. It offers actionable recommendations for educators and policymakers to enhance inclusive education through gamified learning environments and TAMs. The study highlights the idea that a holistic approach, combining technological solutions with inclusive pedagogies, is essential for creating equitable and engaging learning environments that cater to the diverse needs of all students.

Author Biographies

Priscilla Ann Madiona Fenech, Ministry for Education, Sport, Youth, Research and Innovation

Priscilla Ann Madiona Fenech is a Dissertation Supervisor and Lecturer at CC Education Academy, and a Vocational IT/ICT Teacher with The Ministry for Education, Sport, Youth, Research and Innovation in Malta. She holds a Master’s in Vocational Education and Applied Research (ICT) from MCAST, with a focus on inclusive education through gamification. With over a decade of experience in education and training, she supports learners of all ages through technology-enhanced teaching. Priscilla is also a certified Emergency First Response Instructor, Master Scuba Diver Trainer, and Music Educator. She actively contributes to international eTwinning and Erasmus+ projects, promoting innovation and collaboration in education.

Robert Vella, MCAST

Robert Vella is from Gozo, Malta. In 1992 he graduated with a B.Sc. (Melit) in Computer Science and Mathematics. In the same year he joined the teaching profession in a secondary school in Gozo, Malta. In 1992, Robert followed the Pedagogy Course in Education and graduated in 1994. In the meantime, he followed various courses leading to IT certifications. In 2004, Robert was promoted to a Head of Department (Computing). In 2015, Robert graduated with a PGDEL (Melit) – Postgraduate Diploma in Educational Leadership, and in 2016 he graduated with a MA (Melit) in Educational Leadership and Management. In 2016 he joined The University of Sheffield where he read a PhD (School of Education), focusing on the perceptions and experiences of senior female educational leaders in Malta – he was awarded his PhD in February 2021. In July 2021 Robert joined MCAST (The Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology) as a Deputy Director (Gozo). Robert is also a lecturer, supervisor/examiner at MCAST for Master’s programmes.

References

Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer reviewed journals from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295

Boothe, K. A., & Lohmann, M. J. (2020). Using Universal Design for Learning (UDL) for optimal student engagement in the online college classroom. In A. Thornburg, D. Abernathy, & R. Ceglie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Developing Engaging Online Courses (pp. 291–313). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2132-8.ch017

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

Buléon, C., Mattatia, L., Minehart, R. D., Rudolph, J. W., Lois, F. J., Guillouet, E., Philippon, A., Brissaud, O., Lefevre-Scelles, A., Benhamou, D., Lecomte, F., Group, T. S. a. W. S., Bellot, A., Crublé, I., Philippot, G., Vanderlinden, T., Batrancourt, S., Boithias-Guerot, C., Bréaud, J., . . . Chabot, J. (2022). Simulation-based summative assessment in healthcare: An overview of key principles for practice. Advances in Simulation, 7(1), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00238-9

Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the Reading Wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271

Costley, K. C. (2014). The positive effects of technology on teaching and student learning. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED554557.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.

Danielson, M. L., Bitsko, R. H., Ghandour, R. M., Holbrook, J. R., Kogan, M. D., & Blumberg, S. J. (2018). Prevalence of parent-reported ADHD diagnosis and associated treatment among U.S. children and adolescents, 2016. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 47(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1417860

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Elsevier.

Gandal, M. J., Zhang, P., Hadjimichael, E., Walker, R. L., Chen, C., Liu, S., Won, H., Van Bakel, H., Varghese, M., Wang, Y., Shieh, A. W., Haney, J., Parhami, S., Belmont, J., Kim, M., Losada, P. M., Khan, Z., Mleczko, J., Xia, Y., . . . Abyzov, A. (2018). Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science, 362(6420). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8127

Gheyssens, E., Coubergs, C., Griful-Freixenet, J., Engels, N., & Struyven, K. (2020). Differentiated instruction: The diversity of teachers’ philosophy and praxis to adapt teaching to students’ interests, readiness and learning profiles. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(14), 1383–1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1812739

Grynyuk, S., Kovtun, O., Sultanova, L., Zheludenko, M., Zasluzhena, A., & Zaytseva, I. (2022). Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: The experience of Ukraine’s higher education system. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.3.2198

Hao, X., & Lu, H. (2024). The role of self-efficacy and learner engagement in the relationship between prior achievement and final achievement in EFL writing. Learning and Motivation, 87, Article 102007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102007

Haug, K. N. (2016). The Effect of Speech-to-Text Software on Learning a New Writing Strategy. The University of Western Ontario.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2017). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 85–118.

Kalogiannakis, M., Papadakis, S., & Zourmpakis, A. (2021). Gamification in Science Education. A Systematic Review of the literature. Education Sciences, 11(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010022

Kapp, K. M. (2012). The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer & Company. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2378737

Karmen-Tuohy, S., Mboma, S. M., Langfitt, J. T., Brim, R., Gladstone, M., & Taylor, T. E. (2022). “I do lack peace, and I’ve run out of answers”: Primary caregivers’ perspectives on social and behaviour problems in cerebral malaria survivors in Blantyre, Malawi. Malaria Journal, 21(1), Article 123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04142-5

Luke, K. (2021). Twelve tips for designing an inclusive curriculum in medical education using Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles. MedEdPublish, 10(1), Article 118. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2021.000118.1

Lynch, R., Asavisanu, P., Rungrojngarmcharoen, K., & Ye, Y. (2020). Educational management. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.701

Marshall, S. (2019). A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing Academic Practice (5th ed.). Routledge.

Messiou, K. (2012). Confronting Marginalisation in Education: A framework for promoting inclusion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203121184

Müller, K., Engel, C., Loitsch, C., Stiefelhagen, R., & Weber, G. (2022). Traveling More Independently: A study on the diverse needs and challenges of people with visual or mobility impairments in unfamiliar indoor environments. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 15(2), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514255

Neate, T., Bourazeri, A., Roper, A., Stumpf, S., & Wilson, S. (2019). Co-Created Personas: Engaging and Empowering Users with Diverse Needs Within the Design Process. CHI ‘19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300880

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Oyarzun, B., Bottoms, B., & Westine, C. (2021). Adopting and applying the Universal Design for Learning principles in online courses. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.59668/223.3755

Pennell, A., Patey, M., Fisher, J., & Brian, A. (2021). The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale in youth with visual impairments: Psychometrics and a population-specific short form. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 26(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2021.1949321

Priyadharsini, V., & Mary, R. S. (2024). Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in Inclusive Education: Accelerating learning for all. Shanlax International Journal of Arts Science and Humanities, 11(4), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v11i4.7489

Rao, K., & Meo, G. (2016). Using universal design for learning to design standards-based lessons. SAGE Open, 6(4), Article 215824401668068. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688

Reinke, W. M., Stormont, M., Herman, K. C., Puri, R., & Goel, N. (2011). Supporting children’s mental health in schools: Teacher perceptions of needs, roles, and barriers. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022714

Schultheiss, T., & Backes‐Gellner, U.